Monday, August 26, 2019

The Tomb of Sir Richard Burton


Standing in front of the tomb 2019

Burton's Tomb c. 1891
Sir Richard Francis Burton (1821-1890) was a renowned explorer of the Victorian age. He was also a prolific writer, fluent in 29 languages, was a studious anthropologist, quite possibly a spy for the British Empire, a translator of exotic and risqué books such as the Kama Sutra and Arabian Nights, and an accomplished fencer. Recently I had the opportunity to visit the unusual mausoleum where he is buried.
 
The tomb looking somewhat out of place in the catholic cemetery
FENCING BOOKS
He wrote four books dealing with fencing:  A Complete System of Bayonet Exercise (1853), A New System of Sword Exercise for the Infantry (1876), The Book of the Sword (1884), and the Sentiment of the Sword (1911 – published posthumously).



LIFE OF BURTON

In a review of Isabel Burton’s 1893 biography of Richard, the London Times said of him "Few men of our time have led a more romantic and adventurous life than the late Sir Richard F. Burton. A consummate linguist and intrepid traveler, without a rival in his varied knowledge of men, races, and religions, the hero of innumerable adventures, and of more than one almost impossible undertaking, Burton stands forth in these humdrum days as a rare and almost unique personality.”

He was born in a seaside town of Devon, England in March of 1821. His father was an Irish-born British army officer who traveled extensively during Burton’s youth. Because of this he was educated by tutors, for which fencing was one of the few lessons he enjoyed.

Burton was expelled from Oxford in 1842, after which he enlisted with the army of the East India Company. His knowledge of local languages helped his work in surveying and intelligence.


In 1853 he disguised himself as an Islamic pilgrim and visited the holy cities of Mecca and Medina, and gained fame upon the 1855 publication of his adventures in the book “Personal Narrative of a Pilgrimage to el Medinah and Meccah”. Following this he began his expedition to find the source of the Nile River in 1857 with John Hanning Speke. Controversy surrounded the bitter disagreement between the two men about their findings, which ended when Speke shot himself, either in a hunting accident of by suicide.
Isabel Burton 1869
In 1861 he married Isabel Arundell and the rest of his career involved the British Foreign Office, where the two lived in Brazil, Damascus, Syria, and finally in Trieste, Italy. He was knighted in 1886. Isabel shared in many of his adventures and activities, practicing fencing with him and with fencing-masters when he was away. 
Burton in his fencing outfit
Burton died in Trieste at the age of 69 from a heart attack. The design of the tomb was at Burton’s suggestion. Mary Lovell wrote in the Burton biography A Rage to Live that Isabel asked him if he preferred cremation. Burton replied with his usual joke “I do not want to burn before I have got to.” Not being able to cope with a burial at sea, Isabel asked if any other sort of funeral would do. “Yes,” he said, “I should like us to lie in a tent, side by side.” Burton’s funeral in England was on June 15, 1891, the tomb being completed shortly prior. Isabel died in 1896, and joined Burton in his tent.

EXTERIOR OF THE TOMB
The tomb is in the shape of a tent, not necessarily an Arab one as is often described, but more probably modeled on a tent that Richard and Isabel has used for their travels in Syria, tall enough to accommodate the 5’11’ Burton. Burton’s fascination for Arab culture is represented by such Islamic elements as the crescent and star motif around the roof edge, coupled with Isabel’s belief in Catholicism as seen by the crucifix atop the front. 
The exterior is made of Forest of Dean stone, while the inside floor is Carrara marble.

View of the tomb with the church in the background

View from the front of the tomb, where you can see the residential neighborhood in the background

PLAQUES
The front of the tomb bears three marble plaques, one styled as an open book and bearing Richard and Isabel's life dates, a larger tablet containing a memorial poem by Justin Huntly McCarthy, and a stone ribbon commemorating the donors who helped pay for the tomb. McCarthy was an Irish-born novelist and poet who translated some Persian works and helped with one of the publications of the Arabian Nights titled Lady Burton’s Edition of Her Husband’s Arabian Nights. Translated literally from the Arabic. Prepared for household reading by Justin Huntly McCarthy.



THE WINDOW
A window at the rear of the tomb can be accessed by an iron ladder. From it you can view the interior of the tomb. Now plate glass, the window was originally made of stained glass.
 
The window in the back of the tomb, where you can view the interior

Maria takes a peek, as well

 INTERIOR OF THE TOMB
 Through the window can be seen the interior of the tomb. To the left is Isabel’s mahogany coffin, and on the right is Richard’s steel coffin.
The facing wall has a mirror that reflects a small altar underneath the window. The altar holds a crucifix, censers and candleholders. Two glass flasks can be seen on the left of the altar, which are said to contain water from the sacred wells at Mecca that Burton had retrieved.
Large paintings hang over each coffin and glass lights are seen on the floor. Camel bells are strung from the ceiling which apparently would ring when the tomb door, no longer operating, was opened.
 
View from the window. Isabel's wood coffin on the left and Richard's steel coffin on the right

Looking towards the left side of the tomb (Isabel's coffin) from the window

Looking towards the right side of the tomb (Richard's coffin) from the window, with an odd glare on the bottom right.

LOCATION OF THE TOMB
The tomb is located in the churchyard of St. Mary Magdalen Roman Catholic Church. The church was built in 1852 in Mortlake, about 8.5 miles west of central London. The plot belonged to Isabel’s family. The churchyard is a short distance from the Thames, and is a quiet spot separate from the village life surrounding it.
If you plan to visit the tomb be aware that there are several churches with similar names in the London area The church can be accessed fairly easily with a train ride and a bit of walking. The address is 61 N Worple Way, Mortlake, London SW14 8PR, UK

Thursday, January 17, 2019

Notes on A Military System of Gymnastic Exercises, and A System of Fencing (1868) By Archibald Maclaren



Archibald Maclaren was an instructor of physical education and fencing. In 1864 he produced a manual on fencing for military instructors. In 1868 it was combine with his Military System of Gymnastic Exercises, with some updates. The 1868 edition was printed in London under the superintendence of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. The General Order for Horse Guards stated:
“The Field Marshal Commanding-in-Chief has directed the following Regulations for the Gymnastic and Fencing Instruction, and for the Club Exercise, to be printed and bound together in one volume, as more convenient for reference and use than the three separate books hitherto published. By Command, Wm. PAULET, A.G.”

He produced the instructional manual during a period where there was concern that the British military physical fitness was not up to standard. The British Army was keen to open schools of physical training as a result of the Crimean War, where, as Major Frederick Hammersley said “the general health and fitness of recruits and soldiers left a good deal to be desired.”

The first part of the manual, comprising a large portion, is dedicated to the gymnastic exercises. It includes a variety of exercises covering such activities as dumb bells, bar bells, vaulting horse, rings, free climbing and escalading (the surmounting of a wall or other obstacle too elevated to be surmounted by a leap or a vault). Maclaren says of the exercises that “Every exercise comprised in the present system has been selected for its value in one of two aspects: the first, or elementary aspect, being the manner and degree in which it tends to cultivate the physical resources of the body by increasing its dexterity and rapidity of action, its strength in overcoming resistance, and its power of enduring protracted fatigue; while the second, or practical aspect, is the manner and degree in which its practice may be brought to aid directly in the professional duties of the soldier”.

A System of Fencing
Maclaren’s system should be noted for its attempt at efficiency (4 parries, rather than 8), while also giving an in depth analysis of how and why the actions are to be made. He studied fencing in France, presumably the source for most of his material. As it is a system for the military, the lessons are presented for instructors to use in individual or group lessons. The manual is laid out with an introduction and explanation for each action, followed by instructions on how to teach the action.

Maclaren begins by defining fencing, and indicates that the foil is taught because he considers the thrust to be the most effective way of disabling an opponent. The movements of fencing can be arranged under four heads:
-Preliminary Movements or Positions
-Defensive Movements or Parries
-Offensive Movements or Attacks
-Return Attacks

PART I - Preliminary Movements and Positions
This details the movements to come on guard, starting from a position of attention and finishing in the guard.
He emphasizes that “Too much care cannot be bestowed upon the acquisition of a correct guard, for on this depends much of the force and accuracy of the movements in attack and defence.”
He notes that the power of the lunge comes from straightening of the left leg, and that the left hand should fall in position to within a few inches of the thigh. Maclaren concludes that the concentrated action of all the different parts of the body renders the sword-thrust so deadly.
Coming On Guard






It is interesting to note that his instructions for the “longe” (lunge) were altered from his original 1864 publication. In the 1864 publication of a “System of Fencing” he instructs that in the lunge “The column of the body is not now, as in the guard, held perpendicular to the centre of the span of the lower limbs; it has partaken of their forward action, and by its fall has added to their momentum”.
By 1868 he has changed this to keeping the upright position, which was common in the French method. This may have occurred following criticism from other sources, including Richard Burton (Burton notes in his “Sword Exercise”: Mr. MacLaren, in his ' System of Fencing,' &c. sensibly advocates "resting the weight of the body equally upon both legs." He also lowers the right hand in the Lunge, and he throws the trunk forward, perhaps with a little exaggeration. Other than this criticism, though, Burton was an ardent supporter of Maclaren and preferred his gym to that of Angelo’s.)
On the Word "Thrust"

The Longe

Finally with the guard, the advance and retreat, the lunge and the recover, the “learner must be taught to execute them with faultless precision and accuracy before any attempt is made to carry him into the other divisions of the art.”
 
Position of the Hand in the Longe
PART II - Defensive Movements or Parries
Maclaren explains his teaching method for a group. It is to single out one man to teach, and then repeat with each individual as the others circle around to observe.
He gives an explanation of the lines. There are the inner and outer lines, and the upper and under lines. These create four openings. The parry is the special protection for each of the four openings. The defensive motions are made from the engagement. These two movements are called respectively the inner and outer engagements, or the engagements of quarte and tierce. The hand stays in the central position when pressing from the inside, and the hand turns when pressing from the outside.
Maclaren notes that in the quarte parry the hand need only pass a few inches to the inner line to make the defense, for as the attack “passed farther and farther outwards; and, although at the moment of its contact with the defending blade, it may have been made to deviate from the true line but a small fraction of an inch, yet when the longe is completed it will have passed a foot outside the most outlying portion of the breast; just as a shot quitting the muzzle of a gun, and deviating a hair's breadth from the straight line, will be many yards from it at the end of its flight, and the longer its flight the wider its deviation.”
Parry of Quarte



Parry of Tierce
 The parries of seconde and semi-circle defend the lower lines. In the semi-circle parry the point “sweeps on until it is as high as the face, and the hand is elevated a few inches, not only to complete the defence of the upper opening, but the more distinctly to expose the breast of the adversary to the return thrust. This is the Parry of Semicircle and is perhaps the most artistically formed, and in all its features, the most effective parry in the series.”
Parry of Seconde

Parry of Semicircle

He adds that there is a second defense for each line, that being the parries of Quinte, Sixte, Octave, and Prime. The object of the second defense was to give variety in the defenses, but since the same attack deceives both parries, it requires a double labor to learn. He also notes (as Angelo says) that prime is a broadsword, not a smallsword parry.

Counter parries are protection against disengages. His explanation offers an example of Maclaren’s detailed description:
“The instructor and learner are again in the position of adversaries, with the blades joined on the inner line. The instructor, extending his arm, advances his point above the learner's hand. We have seen that quarte will guard this. But were the instructor to lower his point during the extension, and thrust on the under division; or to pass a little farther and thrust on the under line outside; or go still farther, and, elevating the point, thrust above the hand outside, what then? As the attacking blade sinks from the upper to the under line, eluding the contact of the defending one as it completed its parry (quarte), the latter has but to sweep on, while the arm remains stationary forming a central point or pivot on which the hand and foil revolve, and, whether the assailing blade terminate its attack on one of the under lines, or rise above the hand on the outer line, the defending blade, if revolving with sufficient rapidity, must overtake it; and as it comes up to the point from which it started, completing its circle, will pass it off as if by its first and simple parry.' This is called a Counter Parry, and there are four of this description, corresponding to and receiving their names from, the simple parries.”

PART III - Offensive Movements or Attacks.
Maclaren defines the target as limited to between the waist and the collarbone, and extending from armpit to breastbone. On special occasions it might be further reduced to a circle of a few inches in diameter, marked on the center of this space, for the practice of accuracy. He suggests the use of this target because, besides developing accuracy, it is most likely to deliver a killing blow.

He divides attacks in to three Orders (Direct, Indirect, and Counter Attacks), which are then subdivided in to Series. After each Series are instructions on teaching the action.

For the First Order of Direct attacks, the First Series is made Under the Blade, and should be made with opposition. As the covering of one line in a defensive position exposes another, a disengagement is required. Two consecutive disengagements is called the One Two. Three separate consecutive disengagements is called the One Two Three, but is a method falling in to disuse for its complexity.

The Second Series of instruction goes around the blade, the Double to deceive the counter parry. Another example of the detail Maclaren goes in to describe the action:
“Again instructor and learner stand in front of each other, the blades joined on the inner line. The learner makes the disengagement to the outer line which the instructor parries with counter quarte. This formation of counter quarte on the disengagement to the outer line leaves the blades respectively in the same position as before the attack was made; but if, during the act of forming the counter quarte, the attacking blade keeps the lead, and as the revolving blade on the defence comes up on the outer line on its counter, neutralizing the first disengagement, the attacking blade passes to the inner line, again dips and again rises to the outer line, the original opening will be found. Thus the second movement is actually a circle formed within the larger circular defence, starting from and terminating at the opening outside above the hand…As in the One Two Three and the Counter Counter, The more complicated of these combinations are seldom made in the assault; but in the lesson they may be accurately made, and should be assiduously practiced.”

The Third Series is over the blade. This is the cut over. In addition you can make the cut over with the semi-double, and other attacks may follow the cut over, such as the one two and the double.
Maclaren notes that the cut over is more effective as a second attack than as a first. It is more easily and safely made when the adversary's point is elevated than when it is level; or when his arm is much drawn back.

Maclaren states that “combined attacks in fencing are, on a small scale facsimiles of the approaches made by a besieging force,—a series of zig-zags, getting nearer and nearer at each move to the point assailed until the intervening distance can be cleared in a final spring.”

The Second Order consists of Indirect Attacks. They are made previous to a movement of menace or assault, to distract the adversary’s attention, to disturb the security of his position, or to mislead his judgement.

The First Series is the Changement. The Second Series is the Double Engagement. The Third Series is the Beat, which drives the opposing blade a sufficient distance to enable a thrust to reach the breast. The Fourth Series is the beat reverse, an indirect attack that combines the advantages of both changement and beat. The Fifth Series is the Absence, relying on a sense of touch and anticipating a beat with the blades quit.
The sixth series is the Pressure, which consists of a slight addition to the engagement, by bringing the point lower down on the forte of the opposing blade; and although at the disadvantage of foible to forte, pressing it out of the line, until the opening desired be obtained.

The Third Order is Counter Attacks. Maclaren describes these as an alternative to a defensive movement against an indirect attack.
The First series is the Changement, which is a movement called the Counter Disengagement. The Second Series is on the Double Engagement. The same counter attacks may be made on the double engagement. The Third Series is on the Beat, and the same counter attacks may be made on the beat. If the counter attacker perceives the preparation of the beat attack, they can advance their point with opposition, and the beat will arrive too late or be delivered on the forte of the advancing blade and therefore be insufficient. The Fourth Series is on the Beat Reverse, which can be done on the counter disengagement. The Fifth Series is on the Absence and the Sixth Series is on the Pressure.

PART IV. Return Attacks (the Riposte).
Maclaren states that no parry should ever be formed without its being followed up by a return. He also notes that the parry is actually aided by the fullness of the attacker’s lunge, bringing the assailants breast close to the point of the opposing blade. The defender can lunge on the return if the adversary feels the attack parried and recovers, so Maclaren recommends that both the return with a simple extension and return with the lunge should be practiced. The returns are named after the parries from which they are made. Thus the return after the parry of quarte is called the Return in quarte; and that after the parry of tierce, the Return in tierce, &c., &c.

After the First Series of simple returns, the Second Series is the Returns Reverse to the outside line. The Third Series is Second Returns, the Fourth Series is the Double Return, the Fifth Series is Double Return Reverse, the
Sixth Series is The Return Cut-Over (This is most effective when the adversary is on the recovery of the lunge.)

Another form of Second Attack can be made from the lunge, if the adversary is careless in his return, or makes it too complicated, the attacker can remain in the lunge and parry the return, giving a second return. Maclaren notes that there is danger of exposure in lingering in the lunge, but a smart fencer can use it to bait a trap. Maclaren provides lesson in this with the straight thrust, the disengagement and the cut over.

Indirect Return Attacks are coupled with second actions, such as the beat, the graze, bindings. So for instance the defender would make a firm parry in quarte, then give a firm beat and deliver the thrust.

Irregular Attacks
These are a series of return offensive movements called time attacks, which are made during the adversary’s attack, and not at its conclusion. These differ from counter attacks, inasmuch as they are made on direct and not on indirect attacks of an adversary. They can be practiced with an opponent advancing within distance, or withdrawing their hand during the attack.

The Assault
Maclaren gives rules for the Assault. Initially the Assault should be conducted under the supervision of the instructor, and limited to selected movements. He notes that when fencing against different adversaries “No two men fence absolutely alike; and movements that are found effective against one adversary prove quite ineffective against others. All that an instructor therefore should aim at is to teach the learner the nature and purpose of the several movements as set down in his book of instructions, and to qualify him to execute them with perfect precision and the greatest possible quickness…the instructor can give him the hand, so to speak, of the swordsman, the head he must provide for himself.”

A few general rules for conducting the assault are here added.
1. All exposed parts of the body to be thoroughly protected. The head and face by a strong, hand-wrought wire mask. The neck and breast by a stout leather jacket reaching from the chin to a few inches below the waist, with a well-fitting collar buttoning (behind) around the neck. The lower part of the body by a leather flap or apron, either attached to the jacket or buckled round the waist. The right hand by a soft and pliable leather glove or gauntlet, well padded on the back.
2. The adversaries to fall on guard beyond hitting distance.
3. .When both adversaries longe at the same time, and both hits are on the targets, to count for neither; if only one hit be on the target, such hit to count.
4. When both adversaries thrust at the same time, but one only with the longe, and both hits are on the target, to count for the hit given on the longe.
5. It is perfectly fair to make a second attack on the same longe, but if at the time of the second attack the adversary gives a return thrust, and both hits are on the target, the return only to count.

The Salute
Maclaren then describes the Salute in Quarte and Tierce. It is “Performed on occasions or special encounters, or ‘Assaults of Arms’, as they are called, for the double purpose of suppling and preparing the fencer for the assault, and of showing in a graceful and advantageous manner to spectators the chief movements and positions of the art.”




The remainder of the fencing manual gives a listing of the class lessons. This is followed by a short exercise for a bayonet engaged with a bayonet. This is followed, for the last section, with a series of exercises for the regulation clubs, applicable to all stations where dumb and bar bells are not supplied.